RESUMEN
Aims: To describe longitudinal associations between health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) scores and demographic, clinical, and health behavioral characteristics in a multisite U.S. cohort of adults in HIV care. Method(s): People with HIV (PWH) completed an electronic assessment of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) as part of routine clinical care between 2016 and 2021 including measures for HR-QoL (EQ-5D-3L), substance use (ASSIST, AUDIT/AUDIT-C), smoking, and HIV stigma, among others. We used generalized linear latent and mixed models with nonparametric random effects for the intercept term to accommodate repeated measures on individuals to examine longitudinal factors associated with HR-QoL overall and stratified by birth-sex. Result(s): PWH (n = 10,559, median age at first assessment = 49, 17.8% cis-gender women, 1.4% transgender women;68.3% non-White) completed 33,866 assessments. Lower HR-QoL scores were associated with increasing age (p <= 0.0001);identifying as female (cis or transgender) compared to cisgender male (p <= 0.0001, p = 0.005, respectively);living in the Southeast or Western US relative to Northeast (both p <= 0.0001);identifying as a sexual orientation other than gay (heterosexual p = 0.03, bisexual p = 0.009, other p <= 0.0001);higher internalized HIV stigma (p <= 0.0001);current or former smoking (both p <= 0.0001);past methamphetamine use (p = 0.015) and current cocaine/crack, methamphetamine, opioid and cannabis use (p <= 0.0001 for each except cannabis, which was p = 0.007). Higher HR-QoL scores were associated with race/ethnicities other than White (Black: p = 0.002, Hispanic: p = 0.002, other: p <= 0.0001);the COVID-19 pandemic period (March 2020-December 2021) (p <= 0.0001);and increased AUDIT/AUDIT-C score (p = 0.001). In sex stratified models men (n = 8666) had higher HR-QoL scores among non-white compared to white (Black p = 0.0006, Hispanic p = 0.007, Other p <= 0.0001);and during the COVID period (p <= 0.0001). Men had lower HR-QoL scores among heterosexual and bisexual men relative to gay (p = 0.004, p = 0.005), if they were a former smoker (p <= 0.0001), and among past or current methamphetamine users relative to nonusers (p = 0.002, p <= 0.0001). Women (n = 1893) had higher HR-QoL scores if in care longer (p = 0.005), and lower HR-QoL if in the South (p <= 0.0001), if previously used cocaine/crack (p <= 0.0001), or if currently uses marijuana (p = 0.001). Conclusion(s): Our findings describe HR-QoL and its associations among a large diverse cohort of PWH, identifying potentially modifiable factors to improve HR-QoL, such as substance use, smoking, and impact of HIV-related stigma.
RESUMEN
Background: Older adults (≥50 y) living with HIV (OALWH) may experience elevated levels of depression, anxiety, and loneliness. Online mindfulness lessons have the potential to ameliorate these problems and enhance access, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. The objective of this randomized controlled trial was to determine the effectiveness of online mindfulness lessons in reducing feelings of depression, anxiety, and loneliness among OALWH. Methods: The study was conducted between May and August 2020. Individuals with any degree of self-reported loneliness at baseline were eligible to participate. Outcomes of interest included depression, measured using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D-10), anxiety measured using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7), and loneliness measured using both the Three-item Loneliness Scale (3IL) and a Daily Diary that asked “How lonely do you feel today?” Two sample t-tests were used to compare group scores at follow-up. Results: Of 214 participants who were randomized, the mean (SD) age was 60.4 (5.9) years, 89% were male, 69% were white, and 74% were gay or lesbian. At the end of the 25-day intervention, the intervention group demonstrated reduced levels of depression (2.6 point improvement;p<0.01), and reduced levels of anxiety (1.5 point improvement;p=0.03) compared to the control group (Table 1). Among the subset of participants with elevated baseline depression scores (defined as CES-D-10 ≥ 8), the between-group improvement in depression scores was greater (4.2 point improvement;p<0.01). Similarly, among the subset of participants with elevated baseline anxiety scores (defined as GAD-7 ≥ 5), the between-group improvement in anxiety scores was greater (2.4 point improvement;p<0.01). Loneliness improved significantly, as indicated by the Daily Diary, for those with at least moderate loneliness at baseline (0.7 point improvement;p<0.01). Conclusion: This randomized controlled trial is the first to show that a series of brief, online mindfulness audio lessons improves mental health outcomes among OALWH who report some degree of loneliness. For many patients, this intervention may offer emotional relief, particularly with regard to depression and anxiety, even in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic.